From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:53:21 +0100 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rUQCW-009zn6-1t for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:53:21 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rUQCX-0007fk-Bs; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:53:21 +0100 Received: from ptz.office.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:900:1d::77] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rUQCU-0007fF-Jx; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:53:18 +0100 Message-ID: <2240a8b0ba51dd4750bafb4317615f9ec4220ee6.camel@pengutronix.de> From: Lucas Stach To: Michael Olbrich , Robert Schwebel Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:53:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20240126170432.740899-1-m.olbrich@pengutronix.de> <20240126184034.GA176585@pengutronix.de> <20240127105848.GC176585@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [DistroKit] [PATCH v4] platform-v8a: kernelconfig: cleanup X-BeenThere: distrokit@pengutronix.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DistroKit Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , distrokit@pengutronix.de, Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Sender: "DistroKit" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: distrokit-bounces@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Am Montag, dem 29.01.2024 um 09:38 +0100 schrieb Michael Olbrich: > Hi, >=20 > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 11:58:48AM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 07:40:34PM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote: > > > Thanks, applied to next. > >=20 > > The testsuite found two issues: > >=20 > > - CONFIG_COMPACTION: You switched this off, but 'reason' claims that it > > should be on, and the help test for the option does also suggest that > > we better enable this. All of our other kernel configs for other > > platforms have it enabled. >=20 > Lucas, Marc, I don't remember why we disabled this. Unless you know and > have a good reason, I'd say enable it. >=20 There is no good reason, we simply didn't look close enough. The reasoning was that only MIGRATION is required for CMA, but we clearly failed to consider the Kconfig help text when disabling COMPACTION. Regards, Lucas