From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:39 +0100 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqD9D-0007hf-Sr for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:39 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=metis.ext.pengutronix.de) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqD9D-0000Iv-Bn; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:39 +0100 Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqD92-0000Ig-S6; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:28 +0100 Received: from rhi by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqD92-0008PO-J0; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:28 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:28 +0100 From: Roland Hieber To: Robert Schwebel Message-ID: <20211125114228.fpcp7e254au52zbz@pengutronix.de> References: <20211024194534.6704-1-rhi@pengutronix.de> <20211024194534.6704-7-rhi@pengutronix.de> <20211025073735.GD29451@pengutronix.de> <20211124145338.GY28736@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211124145338.GY28736@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Subject: Re: [DistroKit] [PATCH 7/8] mips, mipsel: don't actually compile the kernel X-BeenThere: distrokit@pengutronix.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DistroKit Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: distrokit@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "DistroKit" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: distrokit-bounces@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 03:53:38PM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:37:35AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 09:45:33PM +0200, Roland Hieber wrote: > > > The kernel package only exists to serve a REF_CONFIG for the extra > > > kernel packages, and to compile the userspace kernel tools for debugging > > > purposes. Make the actual kernel compilation and install steps a no-op > > > to save time during the build process, but leave the respective lines in > > > to make porting upstream patches to the kernel recipe easier in the > > > future. > > > > Why is it easier? The kernel package is completely different now. It serves > > a different purpose and the lines that are commented mean that patches > > won't apply either. And I don't think it's actually useful to backport > > anything. > > Any feedback? I can leave out the kernel.make patches in the next iteration, but it will change the kernelconfig due to GCC plugins. You still need the first patches for the mips kernels, or they will probably cause oldconfig issues during the build. - Roland -- Roland Hieber, Pengutronix e.K. | r.hieber@pengutronix.de | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ DistroKit mailing list DistroKit@pengutronix.de