On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:30:06PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:55:30PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> >  create mode 100644 configs/platform-v7a_sisd/patches/barebox-at91-stage1-2020.08.1/0001-HACK-ARM-at91-microchip-ksz9477-provide-first-stage-.patch
> >  create mode 100644 configs/platform-v7a_sisd/patches/barebox-at91-stage1-2020.08.1/0002-ARM-at91-microchip-ksz9477-evb-implement-first-stage.patch
> >  create mode 100644 configs/platform-v7a_sisd/patches/barebox-at91-stage1-2020.08.1/0003-fixup-HACK-ARM-at91-microchip-ksz9477-provide-first-.patch
> 
> What is the good reason to have a fixup patch in a patch stack? Why not
> squash it?

The patches look a bit questionable for DistroKit. Please rework.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel  |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9    |